Last spring, I spent three weeks stuck on a question I had avoided for years: backhoe vs excavator. What should have been a straightforward equipment decision almost got derailed by a discounted compactor and by a mistake I'd made years earlier with a much smaller purchase.
I'm a procurement manager at a 40-person site-development company. I've managed our equipment budget of roughly $1.2 million a year for eight years, negotiated with more than 30 vendors, and tracked every invoice in our cost system. That doesn't make me an equipment expert. It makes me someone who knows what a bad decision costs.
We needed a replacement for an aging backhoe loader. My first instinct was to order another backhoe. That's what the foremen wanted, it's what I grew up around, and it felt like the safe choice. Then I pulled the utilization data and realized the safe choice might be the expensive one.
Our fleet already included two Liugong wheel loaders, a dozer, and a backhoe that was past due for retirement. Over the three years before this purchase, that backhoe averaged roughly 250 hours per year. Meanwhile, we rented excavators for deep utility work more often than I wanted to admit. I had assumed both machines could handle the same trench and left it at that. Didn't verify. Turned out a backhoe loader and a 22-ton excavator have very different work rhythms.
The backhoe can dig the same trench, but it is slower in hard material and the operator feels every shock. That matters when you're paying wages by the hour. When I audited our 2023 spending, I found we had paid nearly $18,000 in excavator rentals because the old backhoe couldn't keep up with production. The rental fleet was already telling us which machine we truly needed.
The spec sheets made the backhoe look fairly straightforward. The operating data pointed in the opposite direction.
While I was waiting for dealer quotes, a sales rep sent me a link to a Liugong compactor for sale. It was a demo unit with low hours and a price that looked too good to ignore. I almost forwarded it to my manager with a note that said, “This looks like a buy.”
Then I checked utilization. We had rented a compactor for 31 hours the previous year. 31 hours. Buying that machine would have added loan payments, insurance, storage, and maintenance for a piece of equipment that would spend most of its life parked. We rented a compactor for four days instead. Based on our cost tracking records, that decision saved us roughly $14,000 in year one.
The near-miss reminded me of a pump mistake I made a few years earlier. I bought a replacement submersible pump for a dewatering job because the spec sheet said “submersible” and the price was right. I didn't check the head pressure. The original was a well pump rated for about 200 feet of head. The replacement was a bilge pump rated for maybe 30 feet. Both move water. Both say “pump” on the box. That's where the similarity ended. The cheaper pump cost us about $1,200 in rework and rental fees after the first wet day on site.
Backhoe vs excavator is the same kind of trap. Both machines dig, both have buckets, and both can load trucks. What I mean is, they can handle some of the same jobs, but they do them at different speeds, costs, and levels of operator strain. Choosing between them without utilization data is like picking a pump based on the word “submersible.”
After comparing eight dealers over three months—or rather, ten weeks once I narrowed the field to excavators—I built a TCO spreadsheet. I analyzed $180,000 in cumulative equipment spending across six years to set up the baseline. The spreadsheet included purchase price, operating cost per hour, expected residual value, attachment compatibility, and parts availability.
According to Liugong's published specifications (liugong.com/en), the 922E sits in the 22-ton excavator class. That gave it more reach, more lifting capacity, and more digging depth than a backhoe loader. But the deciding factor wasn't horsepower. It was whether a part would be available when we needed it.
We already run a Liugong forklift in our material yard. When a hydraulic hose blew last year, I ordered Liugong forklift parts from the local dealer and had them the next day. The same dealer network stocks service kits and undercarriage components for the excavator. A machine with better specs does you no good if it sits for two weeks waiting on a part.
The spreadsheet forced us to answer four questions before making an offer:
We didn't have formal answers to these questions when we started. That's embarrassing to admit because it almost cost us. The compactor was a shiny deal, the backhoe was the familiar choice, and the excavator was more expensive upfront. Without a written framework, we could have justified any of them.
We bought the 922E in late summer 2024. As of early 2025, it has logged more than 600 hours. Utility cycle times are about 30% faster than the old backhoe, mostly because the excavator doesn't reposition as often. The old backhoe went to auction, and we didn't buy a compactor we didn't need.
There's something satisfying about watching the excavator handle a foundation dig without pulling the wheel loader away from truck-loading duty. After the stress of the decision, that's the payoff: a fleet that matches the work instead of a yard full of expensive exceptions.
I still kick myself for not doing the utilization review earlier. If I had, we might have replaced the backhoe two years sooner and avoided some of the rental costs we kept paying to bring in excavators for real digging jobs.
I also want to be honest about the limit of this recommendation. The excavator is not right for every contractor. If you spend most of your day moving between small jobs, loading trucks from a front bucket, and changing attachments frequently, a backhoe loader could serve you better. My advice has a boundary: know your utilization first. If you can't put 500 hours a year on a dedicated excavator, buying one may not make sense regardless of brand.
Take the resale expectations with a grain of salt. The used equipment market moved fast in 2024, and I'm not 100% sure today's numbers will hold for next year. But the principle stays the same: the machine that fits your work keeps its value better than the one that was a deal at purchase time.
Our application engineers can provide project-specific advice based on your equipment needs.
Ask an Expert